Food for Thought Essay

The well known expression, you atomic number 18 what you eat, is even more true as we get on in years. If we had eaten the nutrient that was good for us in our younger years, the chances of staying full-blooded chronic depart improve as we get older. Also, the resemblinglihood of maintaining a gamey quality of life throughout our senior years increases. Reading livelihood columns in newspapers and magazines or from other media sources is a good way to hold the line updated of current food and health related discoveries. How grass we be satisfactory to estimate and gauge the truthfulness of scientific studies about food?Linda Kulman gives us good advice about how to do just that in her article, Food password Can Get You Dizzy, So Know What to Swallow. I believe that for a person to be able to make reasoned dietary choices a person needs to be educated as to the credibility of healthy dietary options. Primarily, to procure and maintain good health, food from all the majo r food groups should be eaten in proper proportion and regularly. Therefore, no unmatchable food is able to maintain good health when eaten al oneness.For instance, No foods be so good that if you ate them to the exclusion of all else, you would be healthy, says M. R. C. Greenwood, a biologist and chancellor of the University of California-Santa Cruz (Kulman, 2012, p. 141). Making the correct dietary choices was, and continues to be a difficult one. Confusion roll in the hay turn to frustration when many reports and studies match each others findings. Canadas Food Guide to Healthy Eating will give us the basics on what constitutes a healthy diet. The food guide basically recommends to eat in moderation and to eat a large variety of foods.The flip-flops of nutritional recommendations by the scientific community are causing bewilderment with many population who are trying to achieve and maintain a good healthy diet. Furthermore, the tale of quality and its claimed screen effec t against colon cancer show how uncertain recognition can lead to confusion. Fiber helps food go through the digestive interbreed faster, cut back the time carcinogens make contact with your intestinal walls. Studies of high fiber eating population and experiments with mice and rats resulted in giving the fiber hypothesis whatsoever credibility.Even though the evidence for higher fiber consumption reducing cancer bump remained uncertain, in 1984 the American Cancer Society make its first specific recommendation to eat fiber to help obstruct colon cancer. Researchers with the Nurses Health Study in Boston tracked the diets and health of more than 88,000 American female nurses since 1980 and found that nurses who ate about 30 grams of fiber a day got colorectal cancer just as often as the average American, who consumes just 13 grams (Kulman, 2012, p. 143).Two redundant get wind results showed that eating more fiber does not reduce the risk of getting colon cancer. These studie s show that there was no significant variation of colon cancer risk between man and women. Researchers continue to suspect that whole fruits and vegetables as well as whole grains are custodial against colon cancer. In conclusion, the fiber story is an example of how reporting results of scientific food studies while the studies are incomplete, can lead to many people becoming discouraged from believing future reported food strike findings.Usually the cause of such distortions is the incompatibility between the needs of science and those of the News Media. The way a lab finding makes its way to the headlines is like a conveyor belt, explains the Statistical Assessment Services Murray. At each step there is a potential distortion. Where science is dependant on(p) and unfinished, journalists want something definitive (Kulman, 2012, p. 143). The most frequent complaints about news reports is that they fly the coop to leave out information that would help readers decide how seriou sly to contain a new finding.The News Media should not be the only one to take the blame for the reporting of incorrect information about study findings. Scientist can get very enthusiastic when reporting their findings to the News Media and can easily be misinterpreted as to the significance of their findings. Scientists are often motivate to embellish their claims to get greater attention and more research funding. This is an unluckily situation for those of us attempting to make an informed choice for a healthy diet.