Are women better rulers than men?

This argu workforcet on the question; are women better regulations than men? pull up stakes focus on the example of Elizabeth I compared to the medium of young-begetting(prenominal) rulers. It mostly depends which era you live in, in modern suit times it would really not make much of a difference as both genders are considered equal. But in the Tudor era, looking at it from the present, a female would decidedly rescue had the upper hand, but from the common perspective of domain in the Tudor times a female would necessitate been considered lower, for a number of reasons, the main one being, female rulers were supposititious to have a husband to make the decisions for them, while the king cat got on producing a male heir. Because it was lady-like in those times. The explanation for lady-like consequently was to be quiet, sit in a street corner be submissive to males and not be able to do any(prenominal) thing for themselves. That really did challenge Elizabeth in th e start as her parliament kept pestering her toThere were a number of traits that Elizabeth to a fault had that made her more successful than others. One of them was she was fluent in 6 languages; her native English, French, Italian, Spanish, Greek, and Latin. Later she came to terms with a collation of german. They became very useful to her in foreign plolitical situations such as when shemade an bond certificate with France. The St Bartholomews Day Massacre, in which thousands of French Protestants (Huguenots) were killed, labored the alliance but did not break it. Elizabeth even began man and wife negotiations with Henry, Duke of Anjou , and later with his younger brother François, Duke of Anjou and Alençon. Another was that she was a fair ruler and upheld the law, when she wanted, she could be ruthless (such as... If you want to get a copious essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.c om

If you want to get a full es! say, visit our page: write my paper